top of page

PPD: SHINKAWA ACB3000 Electrode (AB249-5L) Evaluation
Project Objective:
-
Cost Saving
-
Comparison Study And Performance data to support Electrode under study.

Comparison Study
Objective:
To evaluate SKW AB249-5L Electrode for Cost saving
Strategy:
Comparison study between SHINKAWA Electrode and EQDR Electrode
Wire Type:
Heraeus DHF 2.0 mil (EL: 15 - 25 %, BL: 40 - 55 g)
Capillary:
SPT-UTEDIC-68RN
Sample Size:
​30 Sample per run
Respon​ses
-
Sparking Plasma
-
Free Air Ball (FAB)
Factor Under Study
-
AB249-5L Electrode
Measurement Methode
-
Visual Inspection
-
High Power Scope (Hisomet)
Levels
-
SHINKAWA Electrode vs EQDR Electrode
Background Variables
-
Machine
-
Parameters
Control Method
-
ACB 3000 (SKW-446)
-
FAB Farming


Electrode Comparison
-
SHINKAWA Electrode


Concentrated Blue Plasma from Tip of Electrode
-
EQ Electrode


Concentrated Blue Plasma from Tip of Electrode

FAB Data Comparison
-
SHINKAWA Electrode FAB




-
EQ Electrode FAB




FAB Overview from both Electrode are compatible.
FAB Data Comparison
SHINKAWA Electrode vs EQ Electrode
Raw Data
Summary
-
Both Electrode are quite compatible in terms of fire Plasma. FAB data are compatible and within spec 110 – 130 um.
SKW FAB
EQ FAB

SKW FAB X
SKW FAB Y
EQ FAB X
EQ FAB Y
1
115
114
119
120
2
116
115
116
117
3
115
117
114
115
4
116
117
118
119
5
116
115
120
119
6
120
120
116
118
7
116
118
115
117
8
120
119
118
118
9
118
120
114
116
10
118
118
115
116
11
116
119
114
114
12
116
118
118
118
13
119
120
117
116
14
116
118
117
117
15
118
119
115
114
16
119
118
117
120
17
115
114
117
119
18
115
115
117
119
19
117
118
120
120
20
116
117
119
119
21
116
114
121
120
22
121
118
116
118
23
118
119
115
117
24
116
115
118
120
25
116
118
117
118
26
118
119
117
117
27
116
117
118
118
28
118
117
119
118
29
116
117
119
120
30
116
119
119
118
Avg
116.9
117.4
117.2
117.8
Min
115
114
114
114
Max
121
120
121
120
SD
1.64
1.83
1.90
1.72
bottom of page